2007年3月8日 星期四

Copyfight: Microsoft Takes Shot at Google

March 7, 2007, 8:00 am




Lobbing the equivalent of a Molotov cocktail into the “copyfight” over intellectual property in the digital age, an associate general counsel at Microsoft, Thomas Rubin, issued a scathing attack on Google in remarks prepared for a conference of the Association of American Publishers.
(The full version of Mr. Rubin’s written comments are published at Microsoft’s Web site, for those who are interested.)



Word of the speech, titled “Searching for Principles: Online Services and Intellectual Property,” began circulating late Tuesday, and as with almost anything else involving these two companies, there was keen interest on the blog circuit.


Mr. Rubin’s primary charge? Google’s riches — particularly as it moves into new media markets, according to Reuters — comes by picking the pockets of book, video and software publishers.


The sentiment will find a receptive audience, given that Google and its ambitious Book Search project has been facing down a lawsuit brought by five book publishers — and organized by the publisher’s association — over just this issue for more than a year.


From the Reuters report this morning on the prepared remarks:
“Companies that create no content of their own, and make money solely on the backs of other people’s content, are raking in billions through advertising revenue and I.P.O.s,” said Mr. Rubin, who oversees copyright and trade-secret law.

“Google takes the position that everything may be freely copied unless the copyright owner notifies Google and tells it to stop,” Mr.Rubin said. Microsoft, he said, asks the copyright’s owner for permission first.


Competition is heating up between Google, the world’s dominant search engine, and Microsoft, which more recently entered the Web search market.


Mr. Rubin invokes criticism that Google has faced since its acquisition of YouTube, which has come under fire from media companies for allowing copyright infringement of professionally produced video.


“In essence, Google is saying to you and to other copyright owners: ‘Trust us — you’re protected. We’ll keep the digital copies secure, we’ll only show snippets, we won’t harm you, we’ll promote you,’” he argues.


In response, Google’s chief legal officer, David Drummond, was quoted by BBC News as saying that it complied with international copyright laws, and that it worked with more than 10,000 partners to make books searchable online.


“The result has been more exposure and in many cases, more revenue for authors, publishers and producers of content,” Mr. Drummond said.


None of this, of course, has anything to do with Microsoft launching its own Live Search Books service two months ago.
source link: The New York Times

3 則留言:

maotai 提到...

Nice Blogging!
There is something called "copyleft".
More profound than most economists can imagine.
You may want to take a look!

自由夢 提到...

is "copyleft" just like sth that a programmer created free software, anybody could add function or improve the software if the programmer agreed or just sigend the CC lisence? @@" I think this is one of the features in network economy... right??

EverDark 提到...

我在WIKI找到有關"copyleft"的條目,其連結如下:

http://zh.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Copyleft&variant=zh-tw

這是個蠻有意思的概念,字面上似乎有反諷copyright的意涵,實際上則非如此。她不但保有版權的觀念,而且是用另一種"推廣"、"回饋"式創作的理想,讓著作權能夠不光是被動的受到保護,而且是主動的增加價值。這在如今資訊網路世代下,數位化所帶來的大量創作品流通可能性,我認為是非常值得探究的一種好的、嶄新的概念。